DENVER -- Sealing court filings in the Kobe Bryant sexual assault case could hurt public confidence in the judicial system, attorneys for media organizations argued Tuesday.
In a court filing, attorneys for media including The Associated Press said they oppose the prosecution's bid to have evidence-related motions barred from public view. Prosecutors this month said details in such requests could influence the jury pool and threaten the NBA star's right to a fair trial.
A judge should seal court documents only if there is a proven, substantial risk that disclosure would threaten that right -- and only if there is no other way, media attorney Steven Zansberg wrote.
Bryant faces four years to life in prison or 20 years to life on probation if convicted of sexually assaulting a worker at a Colorado resort where he stayed June 30.
The Los Angeles Lakers' guard has said the two had consensual sex. No trial date has been set.
Under the First Amendment, court documents are supposed to be open to the public unless there is proof they must be sealed. Such proof must be given for each document, Zansberg wrote.
He also said if Judge Terry Ruckriegle issued the order prosecutors are seeking, "it could result in the parties erring on the side of caution by filing all future pleadings under seal."
As an alternative, Zansberg said, the judge could have certain motions filed under seal until he determines whether they could be opened to public review.
"What's going on here is the traditional tug-of-war where the media, acting as the surrogate of the public, is saying `Wait a minute, you've got to justify why you're doing this because of the presumption that court records are open to the public,"' said Jane Kirtley, professor of media ethics and law at the University of Minnesota.
Ruckriegle has scheduled hearings to discuss requests by both sides, and he could make decisions then about the evidence.
Great Products Monday, 18-Dec-2017 09:26:53 EST
Want to meet new friends in your city or anywhere around the US? Check this out!